News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 My help desperately needed: Reeves 

My help desperately needed: Reeves

02 Aug, 2008 12:00 AM

THE rogue obstetrician Graeme Reeves has said he felt obliged to work illegally at two South Coast hospitals because they desperately needed his help and he "felt, in all conscience that I couldn't stand back and watch disaster after disaster after disaster happen".

Mr Reeves, who is being investigated over allegations of sexual assault and botched procedures upon several women at Bega and Pambula hospitals, claimed the "standard of care had improved in my presence, not become worse".

The startling statements were made in evidence he gave to the Garling health inquiry in May, only released publicly on Thursday.

"They [the hospitals] didn't have it under control. It was very poor, in fact. And as a consequence of my actions, the GP obstetricians said, in fact, the prenatal mortality and morbidity was better while I was there than it was before," Mr Reeves said.

However, in the same evidence, Mr Reeves admitted he was guilty of shocking cases of patient neglect at several Sydney hospitals before coming to Bega and Pambula, including complaints involving two deaths, which had led to his ban from obstetrics in 1997.

Despite the ban, he was hired by the Greater Southern Area Health Service in April 2002, because health department officials failed to run adequate background checks.

Mr Reeves was referred on Thursday to the Director of Public Prosecutions for possible criminal charges for lying his way into the job. He illegally provided 32 obstetric services while at Bega and Pambula, 11 of which were emergencies.

Mr Reeves told the Garling inquiry that he accepted the findings of a Medical Board hearing in 1997, which included that two of his patients suffered unnecessarily because he did not give them enough painkilling medication, that he had been extremely aggressive towards a patient and that another patient may have died due to his poor care.

The barrister Terence Tobin, QC, assisting the inquiry, put to Mr Reeves: "You had administered grossly inadequate analgesia resulting in unnecessary suffering to the patient … And you accepted that finding, did you?"

Mr Reeves replied: "Yes, I did."

It was found proven by the committee that your conduct was an extreme example of aggressive conduct towards a patient, which they said was inexcusable?- Yes.

Your inaction in [another patient's] case was a gross example of neglect of care of a patient who may have died as a result of your 'inexplicable denial and refusal of appropriate help offered by another doctor and experienced nurses'; you accepted the validity of that finding, did you not? - Yes.

And you accepted, consequentially, what it said of your competence to practise in the obstetrics field? - Yes.

Mr Tobin asked if he accepted the finding that his lack of care had "seriously endangered of the life of [another patient]".

"Yes, I do," he replied.

Asked whether he took the 1997 findings seriously, Mr Reeves said: "Yes, I take that to heart. That was quite terrible of me."

Before now, the board's Professional Standards Committee hearing in 1997 had been kept secret because it was closed to the public. Legislation in October will make PSC hearings public.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
2



Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 14%
2) Apple iPhone 4 32GB43 plans 6%
3) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 1%
4) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
5) Samsung Galaxy S15 plans 4%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Most Popular


Cowra Guardian







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...